The Negotiatin Phase
- Tom Shankapotomous
- Jan 1
- 2 min read
Updated: 1 hour ago
Part II: The Negotiation Phase

Most people don’t quit at the beginning. They quit here.
You’ve been consistent. You’ve built fitness. You know what you’re doing. And yet something has shifted. Motivation doesn’t show up the way it used to. You negotiate. You delay. You interpret. You wonder whether something is wrong.
Nothing is wrong.
Motivation fluctuates for reasons unrelated to commitment: sleep debt, stress, aging, injury, cognitive fatigue, external pressure. Treating motivation as a prerequisite for action turns normal variance into friction. The more you rely on it, the more time you spend negotiating with yourself.

Endurance disciplines expose this quickly. Early participation can ride novelty and aspiration. Later participation cannot. When motivation is framed as something to be “kept,” its absence is interpreted as failure rather than expected decay.
This is not a personal problem. It is a design problem.
The literature on self‑regulation is clear: sustained behavior depends more on feedback loops, constraints, and pre‑decisions than on emotional intensity. Motivation is a volatile signal—useful for direction, unreliable for execution.
Without structure, motivation is forced to perform labor it cannot sustain.
This is where meaning inflation appears. Every hard session becomes diagnostic. Every dip feels symbolic. Cognitive bandwidth is spent on narrative instead of execution.
A simple rule restores clarity: Difficulty is NOT new information.
If a run hurts, a workout is hard, or progress feels slow—and this was understood in advance—then nothing meaningful has occurred. The system is behaving as specified.
“We knew that going in” is a procedural terminator. It closes unnecessary interpretation and returns attention to the next executable action.
Endurance is not defeated by pain. It is defeated by narration.
This is the limit of motivation as a tool.




Comments